4 ms·
It's especially hilarious because ime, when it's drifting into this mode of constantly saying "production ready, ready to merge, ready to ship", the code it's p
by ffsm8 1y ago
It's especially hilarious because ime, when it's drifting into this mode of constantly saying "production ready, ready to merge, ready to ship", the code it's producing is usually in a complete downward spiral - likely because it's no longer able to reason about the effect the "one little change" will have on the rest of the application.
Ive come to just terminate the session if a phrase like that turns up
Tbf to Nadia however, her comment supposedly came from the "code reviewer" agent? So the prompt might've explicitly asked it to make this statement and would (hopefully) not be reusing the context of the development (and neither the other way)
- nadis 1y agoOP here (Nadia). Yes, in my case I was specifically asking for it to act as a code reviewer and make comments and a recommendation on whether to merge the PR with my changed into our main branch. This just happened to be the response. I feel like Claude specifically uses language in what seems like a more playful way. I notice this also when instead of just a loader there are things like “Baking… Percolating…” etc. I do get the ick if it feels like the agent is trying to be too “human” but in this case I just thought it was funny language for a response to my ask specifically to play a PR reviewer role. Claude in reviewer mode also had a funny (at least to me) comment about it being interesting that Claude put itself as a PR contributor. I think in the screenshot in my blog post (if it got cutoff for others let me know and I can fix), but not called out in the text.