> 5. In latex you have the \document{...} where you can't specify macros so they need to be at the top, in Typst you can specify the macros close to where you n

> 5. In latex you have the \document{...} where you can't specify macros so they need to be at the top, in Typst you can specify the macros close to where you need them. You can define macros anywhere you want, but you can only load packages in the preamble (before \begin{document}). I'm not familiar with Typst, but I would assume that it also requires you to load packages at the top of the document (or at least that's the only place that you would want to load packages). > 6. It's easier to version control and diff, especially if you use semantic line breaks. Semantic line breaks should be totally fine with LaTeX too. > 2. Compiling is instant. > 3. Diagnostics are way easier to understand (sort of like Rust compiler suggestion style). Agreed, these are definitely LaTeX's biggest weaknesses.