3 ms·
> No, it's good enough already. If it takes you hours to figure out what's working and what's not, then it isn't good enough. It should just work or it should
by bertylicious 1y ago
> No, it's good enough already.
If it takes you hours to figure out what's working and what's not, then it isn't good enough. It should just work or it should be obvious when it won't work.
- paulcole 1y agoI mean that’s like saying doing normal coding or working on any project yourself isn’t good enough because you put in hours to figure out what works and doesn’t. It’s just that you don’t like AI lol.
- bertylicious 1y agoThat analogy is off, because LLMs aren't a project I'm working on. They are a tool I can use to do that. And my expectation on tools is that they help me and not make things more complicated than they already are. When LLMs ever reach that point I'll certainly hear about it and gladly use them. In the meantime I let the enthusiasts sort out the problems and glitches first.
- paulcole 1y agoNo, the analogy is good. I’m not just opening up ChatGPT and slapping at the keyboard, there are projects I’m working on. > And my expectation on tools is that they help me LLMs do this for me. You just don’t seem to get the same benefit that I do. > and not make things more complicated than they already are. LLMs do not do this for me. Things are already complicated. Just because they’re still complicated with LLMs does not mean LLMs are bad. > When LLMs ever reach that point I'll certainly hear about it and gladly use them You are hearing about it now. You’re just not listening because you don’t like LLMs.