4 ms·
I don't know -- these are fair points. I do know that when I was using GH regularly on a team where a number of people wrote clean history, the problems you me
by jonahx 1y ago
I don't know -- these are fair points.
I do know that when I was using GH regularly on a team where a number of people wrote clean history, the problems you mentioned didn't come up, not that I can recall. So for the 90% case, let's say, you can do clean history on GH and get the majority of its benefits. But yes, I'm sure it's flawed especially in workflows where those types of problem arise often.
- bccdee 1y agoYeah that's probably fair. I haven't used a commit-centric workflow in a professional context, so I can't really say how often, if ever, these issues come up.