5 ms·
I really dislike that BlueSky named their protocol the "AT protocol" [1], when we already have the AT command set which remains important [2]. [1] https://atpr
by bArray 1y ago
I really dislike that BlueSky named their protocol the "AT protocol" [1], when we already have the AT command set which remains important [2].
[1] https://atproto.com/ https://atproto.com/
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayes_AT_command_set https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayes_AT_command_set
- simonw 1y agoI can forgive them that. There are only 26*26 = 676 two-letter acronyms to go around, and they had the decency to call it "AT protocol" which makes it clearly different from "AT command set".
- est 1y agowell if you think the name is bad, there's also Go, which is conveniently typed as Golang.