20 ms·
Couldn't try to (together with Theo / t3) bully the Homebrew developers into a forced takeover of a package [1] if it were a conflict-free name. [1] https://gi
by timschumi 1y ago
Couldn't try to (together with Theo / t3) bully the Homebrew developers into a forced takeover of a package [1] if it were a conflict-free name.
[1] https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-cask/pull/229061 https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-cask/pull/229061
- AlkalineDreams 1y agoThe cask has not been majorly updated in almost 10 years years and is used to connect to a mobile app that hasn't been on the Play Store for almost 5 years, while easily underneath the minimum threshold of downloads for being removed. What's wrong with asking to expedite the removal process, considering the process is detailed in the guidelines?
- timschumi 1y ago> What's wrong with asking to expedite the removal process, considering the process is detailed in the guidelines? Asking is one thing, the other thing is not accepting the decision of a maintainer on a topic that is at the maintainers discretion and instead taking it to social media [1] [2] for it to be brigaded. Addendum: It additionally appears that this was filed before the browser was even launched, if the Wayback Machine and their social media posts are anything to go by. [1] https://x.com/uwukko/status/1970161297783238905 https://x.com/uwukko/status/1970161297783238905 [2] https://x.com/theo/status/1970266199469810127 https://x.com/theo/status/1970266199469810127