4 ms·

Yeah. Rust, good or bad, affords no special performance advantage for IO performance.

• acdha 1y ago
  Not innately, no, but the kinds of optimizations they’re talking about batching operations and avoiding copies are certainly safer to make using a memory safe language.
• cultofmetatron 1y ago
  correct, stable, fast <- rust's whole deal is giving normal people a chance of building something that gets you all 3.
  • J_Shelby_J 1y ago
    I touch rust every day, but you should also mention the priority of those three things are also in that order.
    • deleted 1y ago
      [deleted]