4 ms·
I genuinely think the next move will be using it as part of their age verification check. I am guessing they want it to be your online id. No more anonymous int
by pipes 1y ago
I genuinely think the next move will be using it as part of their age verification check. I am guessing they want it to be your online id. No more anonymous internet usage.
It is really grim what is happening to the UK. For the most part no one gives a shit. And if you do, you are automatically branded as "right wing".
- voidUpdate 1y agoReally? I've generally seen more people on the left giving a shit about government overreach etc
- pipes 1y agoWell, the left usually wants to expand the size of government and increase the number of things that it is responsible for.
- somelamer567 1y ago> No more anonymous internet usage And given the torrent of inauthentic "right wing" commentators nudging public opinion on the BBC's Have Your Say, the Daily Mail and Reddit, I'm not entirely sure this will be a bad thing. Recall that Iran cut off the internet for university exams, and the volume of posting by Scottish pro-independence accounts on Twitter/X dropped 98%. Food for thought.
- philipallstar 1y ago> And given the torrent of inauthentic "right wing" commentators nudging public opinion on the BBC's Have Your Say, the Daily Mail and Reddit, I'm not entirely sure this will be a bad thing. Reddit is the most left-wing moderated, fedora-tipping regime it's possible to get.
- astroflection 1y agoCorrelation is not causation.
- angryscot25 1y agoAre you thinking of the US bombing Iran perhaps? Assuming they are running such a disinformation campaign (which is the theory you are talking about) why would they shoot themselves in the foot and cut their own spooks' connection off? And you're off by almost two order of magnitudes, the study in question found that 4% of pro-indy activity was linked to Iranian controlled attacks (and I am highly doubtful of Twitter's influence in that debate in 2025...)