4 ms·
Antibabelic, I think you're arguing with a prankster. Look at this user's comments history, all they do is write obscure non sequiturs and rail against some vag
by the_af 1y ago
Antibabelic, I think you're arguing with a prankster. Look at this user's comments history, all they do is write obscure non sequiturs and rail against some vague conspiracy of CS (that's computer science, they seldom clarify) and engineering.
It's either a troll or someone with problems. Since the username is "mallowdram" (melodram(a)) I'm leaning towards prankster.
- Antibabelic 1y agoThe specificity of what they're trying to say and long Google Docs documents (apparently with their personal name in them) make me incline towards the other option.
- mallowdram 1y agoWhy would you waste time caring one way or the other?
- mallowdram 1y agoThese aren't obscure non-sequiturs, and the very obvious AI bubble is indicative of a culture of CS that traded complexity for bypassing the dark matter of language, which is not disputable in majority of linguistics sub-fields. If you can't discourse with it, then it's smart not to lose your lunch over it. Just move on.
- hackeraccount 1y agoThe general confusion of that type of thing is trying to figure out if the person is an ass with some sort of a point or a troll with no point. If you're ever at a place where you're unsure of this you can generally be it's not worth the effort to figure it out.