3 ms·
Because there are a number of existing frustrations with GNOME that can not be fixed in GNOME, because GNOME Foundation has their own specific vision, which not
by graynk 1y ago
Because there are a number of existing frustrations with GNOME that can not be fixed in GNOME, because GNOME Foundation has their own specific vision, which not a lot of people like.
KDE is good but has its own flaws, and it's a different workflow
- array_key_first 1y agoIMO KDE is not a different workflow. You can easily recreate all of gnome in KDE. So, just use KDE.
- BaardFigur 1y agoTried KDE. I very much prefer Gnome with extensions
- yjftsjthsd-h 1y agoCan KDE do dynamic workspaces now? That was one of the nicer things about GNOME last time I used it
- array_key_first 1y agoYes, it's in the overview.
- graynk 1y agoyou really can't. I have tried and I am trying every couple of years. I hope it gets there one day though it's also usually more buggy for me, so there's that.
- array_key_first 1y agoI legitimately cannot think of a single feature in Gnome, Windows, or MacOS that does not exist in KDE. Now, granted, you would only know that if you're a KDE wizard. So maybe Gnome defaults coincidently align better with what you like. But in terms of functionality, there just isn't any contest.
- graynk 1y agoMaking a single virtual desktop on my second monitor that remains static, while the primary switches between them Having a good screenshot tool on Wayland that freezes the screen, lets me select a region of the screen in an overlay, then puts the selection in my clipboard and vanishes jn the background. KDE one was insistent on spawning its window and wasn't very good. Third party tools failed on Wayland on region selection. Especially with scaling enabled. Not having random Z-index order bugs is also a big one
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]