3 ms·
The phrasing "Legal but non-reachable " makes clear that they use some notion of legal that differs from the normal one of reachability. It's hard to imagine wh
by tromp 1y ago
The phrasing "Legal but non-reachable " makes clear that they use some notion of legal that differs from the normal one of reachability.
It's hard to imagine what sensible notion that could be though.
Something like: each side having only one king, no pawns on first/last row, at most one king in check, etc ?!