3 ms·
But can you escape from that relation being identifiable as having a type or being a type, even if you don't find it interesting/helpful and don't use it? Also
by kazinator 1y ago
But can you escape from that relation being identifiable as having a type or being a type, even if you don't find it interesting/helpful and don't use it?
Also the concept of a proof of equality strikes as relevant, because some equalities are actually incomputable. E.g. suppose you want a an equality type for whether two functions are equivalent (two instances of the same function type).
- auggierose 1y agoDon't use types for logic, then you have already escaped. Of course, if you prefer living in a prison, that's up to you. If you want equivalence, use an equivalence relation.