3 ms·
I wouldn't call that a nitpick, it's a major annoyance. Version numbers become useless with that kind of policy.
by Al-Khwarizmi 1y ago
I wouldn't call that a nitpick, it's a major annoyance. Version numbers become useless with that kind of policy.
- kridsdale1 1y agoThe numbers are branding. The appear to be an indicator of a given year long training run. New “versions” are tweaks of the same base.
- tempest_ 1y agoSure and that is why you can call it 2.5.<whatever> They just don't want to be pinned down because the shifting sands are useful for the time when the LLM starts to get injected with ads or paid influence.
- sally_glance 1y agoI wish they would actually explain it like that somewhere. Or publish the internal version numbers they must certainly be using to ensure a proper development process.