4 ms·
> Reading and reviewing clean history is really so much nicer. You can have both with git and it's not even hard. Unfortunately it seems many people pride the
by sodapopcan 1y ago
> Reading and reviewing clean history is really so much nicer.
You can have both with git and it's not even hard. Unfortunately it seems many people pride themselves in what little they know of git. I'm not being sarcastic, I've read people say this almost word-for-word.
- kiitos 1y agogit is a means, not an end commits mean precisely what their author intend them to mean, nothing more if you squash-merge every PR then history is clean where it matters
- sodapopcan 1y agoTo quote my least favourite HN response: "No."
- m000 1y agoSuch developers should be condemned to work with CVS until they repent for their sinful statements.