I'm curious why they decided to go after their own implementation while the IETF AI Preference working group[0] is actively working on a similar concept to defi

I'm curious why they decided to go after their own implementation while the IETF AI Preference working group[0] is actively working on a similar concept to define vocabulary[1] and a way to attach[2] it to HTTP responses and robots.txt. (Which still has plenty open dicussions, but still) There's also Really Simple Licensing[3] that covers these concepts (with additional capabilities and a slightly different purpose/angle). References: [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/aipref/about/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/aipref/about/ [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aipref-vocab/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aipref-vocab/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aipref-attach/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aipref-attach/ [3] https://rslstandard.org/ https://rslstandard.org/