3 ms·

Source on that?

• bapak 1y ago
  From TFA > the proposed legislation includes exemptions for government accounts used for “national security purposes, maintaining law and order or military purposes”. Convenient.
  • kevincox 1y ago
    I can buy the military exemption, and maybe some very top level government workers that are effectively military (example: POTUS). But the EU parliament has no reason to be excluded. It is definitely a terrible law if it is so bad that they won't pass it unless they are excluded.
    • Vinnl 1y ago
      Interestingly Parliament is against Chat Control: https://edri.org/our-work/chat-control-what-is-actually-going-on/ https://edri.org/our-work/chat-control-what-is-actually-goin...
    • pests 1y ago
      > top level government workers that are effectively military (example: POTUS) POTUS is very specifically NOT a member of the military. Elected civilian control was the whole point. Even Eisenhower had to (temporarily) give up his general rank to serve as president. I do understand your core point tho.
    • 11mariom 1y ago
      > I can buy the military exemption While I understand it… there is no need for any exemption if the bad, stupid law will not be in place at all ;)
• cuu508 1y ago
  Page 36, section 2a here: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2024-04-11-conseil-csam-compromis-9-avril.pdf https://www.patrick-breyer.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/202...