4 ms·

It shouldn't be. But here we have UN and other twisting it to fit a situation that clearly weren't meant to be covered by it. Because if the war in Gaza can b

It shouldn't be. But here we have UN and other twisting it to fit a situation that clearly weren't meant to be covered by it. Because if the war in Gaza can be called a genocide so can almost every single other major war! Also it is absolutely ridiculous to call a war that is started by one side, and one that only that side can end, a genocide against the same side that started it!

komali2 1y ago
[flagged]
- skinkestek 1y ago
  [flagged]
  - ascorbic 1y ago
    > Hamas executes possible the worst sexual terrorism since the rape of Nanking in 1937: not a word about war crimes. What are you talking about? The ICC issued an arrest warrant for war crimes for the Hamas leadership
  - komali2 1y ago
    Again, it's time to open your eyes, you are on the wrong side of history. The world isn't against you, it's against what Israel is doing to Palestine. You don't have to dig your heels in.
    - skinkestek 1y ago
      The emperor has no clothes even if he, the entire royal court and the newspapers report it.
      - komali2 1y ago
        In this case you're believing the emperor. Remember the "terrorist check in list" that was just a calendar? Israeli propagandandists don't even have the respect to make up plausible lies anymore.
Manuel_D 1y ago
This is indeed a big obstacle to credibly calling the Israel-Palestine conflict a genocide. Germany lost ~10% of it's population in WW2. France lost 4% in WW1. Less than 1% of the Palestinian has been killed since Oct 7. Heck, the US Revolutionary war saw the British perpetrated genocide against the Colonists if the military actions following Oct 7 count as a genocide.
- ragazzina 1y ago
  > Germany lost ~10% of it's population in WW2. 75% of those were military deaths, 25% civilian deaths. In Gaza the numbers are switched.
  - Manuel_D 1y ago
    Even if the numbers are true, that leaves Germany with 2x the proportion of civilian deaths.
ragazzina 1y ago
In your opinion, is there a neutral organization in the world that could define whether the legal definition of genocide is being met or not?

komali2 1y ago

[flagged]

skinkestek 1y ago
[flagged]
- ascorbic 1y ago
  > Hamas executes possible the worst sexual terrorism since the rape of Nanking in 1937: not a word about war crimes. What are you talking about? The ICC issued an arrest warrant for war crimes for the Hamas leadership
- komali2 1y ago
  Again, it's time to open your eyes, you are on the wrong side of history. The world isn't against you, it's against what Israel is doing to Palestine. You don't have to dig your heels in.
  - skinkestek 1y ago
    The emperor has no clothes even if he, the entire royal court and the newspapers report it.
    - komali2 1y ago
      In this case you're believing the emperor. Remember the "terrorist check in list" that was just a calendar? Israeli propagandandists don't even have the respect to make up plausible lies anymore.

Manuel_D 1y ago

This is indeed a big obstacle to credibly calling the Israel-Palestine conflict a genocide. Germany lost ~10% of it's population in WW2. France lost 4% in WW1. Less than 1% of the Palestinian has been killed since Oct 7. Heck, the US Revolutionary war saw the British perpetrated genocide against the Colonists if the military actions following Oct 7 count as a genocide.

ragazzina 1y ago
> Germany lost ~10% of it's population in WW2. 75% of those were military deaths, 25% civilian deaths. In Gaza the numbers are switched.
- Manuel_D 1y ago
  Even if the numbers are true, that leaves Germany with 2x the proportion of civilian deaths.

ragazzina 1y ago

In your opinion, is there a neutral organization in the world that could define whether the legal definition of genocide is being met or not?