3 ms·
> Symbian phones from early 2010's are more capable... I suppose there was no need to mention Symbian. It was a hellish system to develop for, and once smartph
by thw_9a83c 1y ago
> Symbian phones from early 2010's are more capable...
I suppose there was no need to mention Symbian. It was a hellish system to develop for, and once smartphones had a little more RAM and CPU power, Symbian had absolutely no future. Nokia's answer to the iPhone was MeeGo [0], which wasn't bad, but Google's Android was, in fact, even better.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MeeGo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MeeGo
- aranelsurion 1y ago> Google's Android was, in fact, even better. More like it was around three years earlier to the market, and already had a huge network of users, developers and apps.