3 ms·
No it's not. Shitting in a river is always a net negative. Regulations can be positive, negative, or ineffective. Trying to "just count" the regulations to dete
by scott_w 1y ago
No it's not. Shitting in a river is always a net negative. Regulations can be positive, negative, or ineffective. Trying to "just count" the regulations to determine quality completely discards this critical dimension and betrays an almost childlike view of the world.
- potato3732842 1y ago>Shitting in a river is always a net negative It beats anything open air by miles. Sure, an outhouse would be better but river > street. >Trying to "just count" the regulations to determine quality completely discards this critical dimension and betrays an almost childlike view of the world. You're grasping at straws here. I am under no obligation to give such an infantile opinion (the one I initially replied to) a response at length. This is not the venue for such minutia.
- scott_w 1y ago> I am under no obligation to give such an infantile opinion Responding with “I know you are but what am I?” is just proving my point.