I am on really shaky ground, but I think that they are representing "uncertainty" in the QC sense per event and that they claim that over the totality of the ev

I am on really shaky ground, but I think that they are representing "uncertainty" in the QC sense per event and that they claim that over the totality of the events this then represents reality better than stochastic sampling. But I've been reading the paper on and off today and I don't really understand much of it at all.