So in a meta conversation about news, there was discussion yesterday about social media and speech. One of the main reoccurring threads of conversation was that

So in a meta conversation about news, there was discussion yesterday about social media and speech. One of the main reoccurring threads of conversation was that news should be left to the experts and those vetted. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45352213 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45352213 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354893 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354893 If that was the model that society adopted, the fine article would be among the set of data being censored. Robert Graham seems to be competent in his field but he lacks the pedigree that the NYT wants to cite. Even worse, he disagrees with those who the NYT turn to as matter experts: https://substack.com/@cybersect/p-174413355 https://substack.com/@cybersect/p-174413355