3 ms·
The fallacy is "if it can be trained, it is therefore logically a muscle". Ask your same dictionary to define muscle, and ask yourself if the immune system is
by ceejayoz 1y ago
The fallacy is "if it can be trained, it is therefore logically a muscle".
Ask your same dictionary to define muscle, and ask yourself if the immune system is a "band or bundle of fibrous tissue in a human or animal body that has the ability to contract".
- ASalazarMX 1y agoExcept my statement was "If it can be trained, it _behaves like_ a muscle", meaning that muscles and the immune system can be trained. I don't see how it can be reasonably misinterpreted as "the immune system is literally a muscle", I'm not talking about unfeathered chickens here.