>How can they be opposed to immigration" because if they said "how can they be opposed to illegal-immigration" their argument would fall apart pretty quickly.

>How can they be opposed to immigration" because if they said "how can they be opposed to illegal-immigration" their argument would fall apart pretty quickly. Isn't this also disingenuous? A significant proportion of the groups against immigration are against any immigration and have been floating trial balloons for "remigration" for non-white citizens.