3 ms·
Then it should be called manageless?
by codedokode 1y ago
Then it should be called manageless?
- DangitBobby 1y agoStill confusing, since infrastructure you don't have to manage yourself is sometimes called "managed". It makes sense from the perspective of "you are paying us to manage this for you".
- simonw 1y agoIt's a terrible name, but it's been around for over a decade now so we're stuck with it. I mostly choose not to use it, because I don't like using ambiguous terminology if I can be more specific instead. So I'll say things like "scale-to-zero".
- nenenejej 1y agoScale to zero covers a lot of turf from AWS Lambda to CDNs to Fargate to DO app platform.
- NaomiLehman 1y agothese are just automanaged cloud servers, I guess?
- nenenejej 1y agoBack in the day it was called PHP. You uploaded a PHP file. No server to manage. Nothing else to do!