3 ms·
For a small project, this would be fine. Maybe a slight step up from just storing data in a single local file. For a more serious small project, SQLite is the w
by datadrivenangel 1y ago
For a small project, this would be fine. Maybe a slight step up from just storing data in a single local file. For a more serious small project, SQLite is the way to go, as git's 'atomic' commits are still going to be relatively slow.
I assume you'd struggle to get a few hundred commits per second even on good hardware?
- porridgeraisin 1y agoSome 4k per second on my laptop if you use git non-porcelain commands directly.
- datadrivenangel 1y agoSo that's actually within an order of magnitude or three of SQLite performance. Better than expected!