The author does not dispute devices were found. Author expresses a belief it was controlled by a criminal enterprise. Author then claims to understand the inten

The author does not dispute devices were found. Author expresses a belief it was controlled by a criminal enterprise. Author then claims to understand the intent of said enterprise. The pattern: 1. Corroborate fact. 2. Pose plausible cause of fact. 3. Present unsubstantiated claim as fact. Sounds like propaganda to me.