2 ms·
This is unrelated to Ruby and the author is against free speech because he wants to professionaly censor someone because of his work-unrelated opinions. Plus t
by dominicrose 1y ago
This is unrelated to Ruby and the author is against free speech because he wants to professionaly censor someone because of his work-unrelated opinions.
Plus there are perfectly valid reasons to prefer some categories of people over others. It has nothing to do with hate or fascism, it's only natural.
I'm a DINK (double-income no kids) and I don't feel the hate of DDH, I only see someone who thinks it's worthwhile to be a parent and it's a dead end not to be. It's technically true and you can't argue against that anyway.
- pmdr 1y agoWait, people are complaining about his views on having children now?
- jemiluv8 1y agoHilarious
- pmdr 1y agoI mean, what's the take here? Discrimination against people who can't have children? Hatred towards those who won't? Did he only encourage people of a certain race to have children? I remember listening to some interviews/podcasts where he discussed this. I don't have children myself, but I did not detect any malice in his arguments.
- jemiluv8 1y agoNeither did I and that was why I found the whole thing rather hilarious. This is not even a discussion
- dominicrose 1y agoTBH my comment was a reaction to the tiniest bit of the article. The author just HAD to add this part after all the rest didn't he?