4 ms·
This entity is sentient enough not to publish on arxiv medrxiv or biorxiv, where they will surely be red-flagged for self citations and single-authorship Their
by gsf_emergency_2 1y ago
This entity is sentient enough not to publish on arxiv medrxiv or biorxiv, where they will surely be red-flagged for self citations and single-authorship
Their most believable and unsensational works are in generative histopathology
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.e23500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.e23500
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.e13592 https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.e13592
Meeting abstracts (you can think of them as posters or talks given by interns)
>The trained model’s validation accuracy of 73.7% improves upon past reported methods.
Mediocre performance, but at least those papers have coauthors
- aleph_minus_one 1y ago> they will surely be red-flagged for self citations and single-authorship Where is the problem with single-authorship?
- gsf_emergency_2 1y agoI don't see a problem personally but single, or more strictly speaking, for medical journals, --even medrxiv-- unaffiliated authorship is a (internal) filter