> I don't really see complaints about TOML! Sampling bias, there are no complaints about it because no-one uses it (jk). It's subjective of course but despite

> I don't really see complaints about TOML! Sampling bias, there are no complaints about it because no-one uses it (jk). It's subjective of course but despite the name TOML never really seemed that 'Obvious' to me, in particular the spec for tables. I also think the leniency in the syntax isn't necessarily a good feature and serves to make it less 'Minimal' than its name suggests.