4 ms·
definitely - the standford video has a slide about how many cases caused people to be even slower than without AI
by dhorthy 1y ago
definitely - the standford video has a slide about how many cases caused people to be even slower than without AI
- mcny 1y agoQuestion for discussion - what steps can I take as a human to set myself up for success where success is defined by AI made me faster, more efficient etc?
- 0xblacklight 1y agoIn many cases (though not all) it's the same thing that makes for great engineering managers: smart generalists with a lot of depth in maybe a couple of things (so they have an appreciation for depth and complexity) but a lot of breadth so they can effectively manage other specialists, and having great technical communication skills - be able to communicate what you want done and how without over-specifying every detail, or under-specifying tasks in important ways.
- Planktonne 1y ago>where success is defined by AI made me faster, more efficient etc? I think this attitude is part of the problem to me; you're not aiming to be faster or more efficient (and using AI to get there), you're aiming to use AI (to be faster and more efficient). A sincere approach to improvement wouldn't insist on a tool first.
- keeda 1y agoAccording to the Stanford video the only cases (statistically speaking) where that happened was high-complexity tasks for legacy / low popularity languages, no? I would imagine that is a small minority of projects. Indeed, the video cites the overall productivity boost at 15 - 20% IIRC.