3 ms·
"Instead, it's about having shorter, more expressive code." yes, but at the expense of a lot of other negative baggages that comes along with it. by having it'
by jaequery 14y ago
"Instead, it's about having shorter, more expressive code."
yes, but at the expense of a lot of other negative baggages that comes along with it. by having it's own compiler rather than leaving that to the browser seems like it's opening a can of worms.
and just reading from the comments, i can see how we could soon see a birth of "another language", that's supposed to be solve all problems coffeescript'ers face.
for one, i guess readability seems to be the common problem, which isn't good for productivity.
- SoftwareMaven 14y agoi can see how we could soon see a birth of "another language", that's supposed to be solve all problems coffeescript'ers face That's called incremental progress a d most people see it as a good thing. Others yell, "Get off my lawn!"
- encoderer 14y agoIt sounds like you haven't ever used CoffeeScript? Don't you find it a little odd that you have such strong opinions on something you've never even tried?