4 ms·

Grindr Dating App Crashes in Milwaukee During Republican National Convention: Everything We Know https://www.newsweek.com/grindr-app-crashes-milwaukee-rnc-1927

Grindr Dating App Crashes in Milwaukee During Republican National Convention: Everything We Know https://www.newsweek.com/grindr-app-crashes-milwaukee-rnc-1927750 https://www.newsweek.com/grindr-app-crashes-milwaukee-rnc-19... JUL 19, 2024 AT 03:27 PM EDT ~~~ Grindr CEO confirms ‘significant’ user spike during Republican National Convention https://unherd.com/newsroom/grindr-ceo-confirms-significant-user-spike-during-rnc/ https://unherd.com/newsroom/grindr-ceo-confirms-significant-... July 7, 2025 ~~~ Things get VERY awkward after antigay congressman is asked about his alleged Grindr profile https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/things-get-very-awkward-after-antigay-congressman-is-asked-about-his-alleged-grindr-profile/ar-AA1BEizw https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/things-get-very-awkwa... 6 months ago ~~~ But by all means, Claude going down for 15 minutes yesterday explains this all away.

duxup 1y ago
Seems like conspiracy theory thinking tying 3 events to ... what exactly? I'm guessing there were many events where there were no outages.
- leakycap 1y ago
  You didn't pay for the premium research package, which gets you more than 3 results. I notice you have provided zero context/info/links, but thanks for your "I guess" post and complaint. You added a lot to the conversation and I'm sure your next reply will really take the cake!
  - duxup 1y ago
    I don't understand your response.
    - leakycap 1y ago
      Your words: "Gotta make the case to me why they're directly related ..." My response: Here are 3 more examples, in addition to the article we're commenting on here You then say: "Seems like conspiracy theory thinking tying 3 events to ... what exactly?" My response: Expecting someone to provide more than 3 links when you've done nothing except say "nuh-uh!" in the thread is silly and your next response will likely be less helpful. You: huhcat.gif
      - duxup 1y ago
        The idea here is that there's some connection right? I'm saying show that. I bet given enough time you can show 3 occurrences occurring of just about anything.
        leakycap 1y ago
        > I bet given enough time you can show 3 occurrences occurring of just about anything. A nice way of saying you'll ignore any evidence you're presented. > I'm saying show that. You already told me you don't care, why would I waste my time - especially when you continue to add nothing to the conversation.

duxup 1y ago

Seems like conspiracy theory thinking tying 3 events to ... what exactly? I'm guessing there were many events where there were no outages.

leakycap 1y ago
You didn't pay for the premium research package, which gets you more than 3 results. I notice you have provided zero context/info/links, but thanks for your "I guess" post and complaint. You added a lot to the conversation and I'm sure your next reply will really take the cake!
- duxup 1y ago
  I don't understand your response.
  - leakycap 1y ago
    Your words: "Gotta make the case to me why they're directly related ..." My response: Here are 3 more examples, in addition to the article we're commenting on here You then say: "Seems like conspiracy theory thinking tying 3 events to ... what exactly?" My response: Expecting someone to provide more than 3 links when you've done nothing except say "nuh-uh!" in the thread is silly and your next response will likely be less helpful. You: huhcat.gif
    - duxup 1y ago
      The idea here is that there's some connection right? I'm saying show that. I bet given enough time you can show 3 occurrences occurring of just about anything.
      - leakycap 1y ago
        > I bet given enough time you can show 3 occurrences occurring of just about anything. A nice way of saying you'll ignore any evidence you're presented. > I'm saying show that. You already told me you don't care, why would I waste my time - especially when you continue to add nothing to the conversation.