3 ms·
I agree, but I get 100% of the usefulness of these tools by installing them with one command and using them. Why settle for 90% when 100% takes a second?
by stavros 1y ago
I agree, but I get 100% of the usefulness of these tools by installing them with one command and using them. Why settle for 90% when 100% takes a second?
- jmarchello 1y agoFair point. I don't disagree. I personally just like to stay as close to default GNU/Linux tooling as is practical. It's a matter of personal taste. For me, this makes it so my expectations and muscle memory transfer cleanly between my workstation and other servers, devices, etc. I find the default tools are much more powerful than is often understood, and you can replicate most third party functionality fairly easily. That's not always the case mind you, and I happily use those tools.
- stavros 1y agoI used to agree, but nowadays my thinking is "I use my own machines 99.99% of the time, why optimize for the 0.01%?".