4 ms·
No intention huh? Maybe you think the underground bunkers are for funsies. That is the silliest thing I have heard today. Congratulations.
by 1234letshaveatw 1y ago
No intention huh? Maybe you think the underground bunkers are for funsies. That is the silliest thing I have heard today. Congratulations.
- figmert 1y agoIgnore the rest of what wrote, and preemptively call facts silly. I'm sure you're more familiar with the matter than IAEA. Heck, even Tulsi Gabbard, the US intelligence director initially said they were not building nuclear weapons, until she changed her tune after Trump probably barked at her.
- 1234letshaveatw 1y agointeresting that you reference the IAEA- do you know if they estimate to what extent Iran enriches their uranium stockpile?
- figmert 1y agoSo they can't build nuclear energy to power their infrastructure?
- WillPostForFood 1y agoFor power, uranium needs to be 3-5% enrichment, medical applications about 20%, and weapons will be 95%. The IAEA confirmed in May 2025 that Iran's had a stockpile of over 400kg of 60% enriched uranium. That's not enrichment for power. They had a stockpile at 20% in 2015 when the JCPOA was made, that was also well over what was needed for power.
- catlover76 1y ago[dead]
- code_for_monkey 1y agowho are we going to believe, international nuclear warhead investigators or your gut impulse?