3 ms·
In terms of being able to pay off a debt, having more resources (power from wind and fossil fuels) is strictly better than less (just the fossil fuels). So tha
by margalabargala 1y ago
In terms of being able to pay off a debt, having more resources (power from wind and fossil fuels) is strictly better than less (just the fossil fuels).
So that's not even remotely economically sound or logical.
In conclusion you're probably right.
- bawolff 1y agoI suppose hypothetically if he significantly increased royalties/export fees/whatever and joined OPEC to manipulate the price of oil, it might help. Obviously that would be crazy.
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> if he significantly increased royalties/export fees/whatever and joined OPEC to manipulate the price of oil, it might help Joining OPEC would subject the United States to production quotas. We're the world's largest oil producer. But we're also the largest consumer.
- margalabargala 1y agoBut, like, even in that eventuality, it would be better for the US to have a bunch of wind power so we can export more oil.
- esseph 1y agoI agree! I'm just brainstorming at this point but it's basically like guessing in a game of Texas Holdem.