This film is very different from interlaced video. Interlaced video fields (the two parts of a single frame) are captured at different points in time. This film

This film is very different from interlaced video. Interlaced video fields (the two parts of a single frame) are captured at different points in time. This film has frames captured at different points in time. The similarity ends here. With interlaced video, the two fields make a single frame. With this film, every frame is displayed three times: First, with the two frames that precede it; next, with the one that precedes it and the one that follows; lastly, with the two that follow. Every frame (with the exception of the beginning and the end) would be displayed three times. Now, we can certainly create our own "full color" frames by successively combining every three frames (1-2-3; 2-3-4; 3-4-5; 5-6-7; e-t-c) but now, I believe, we either have to have some intelligence in software to find parts from other frames that can be moved and morphed to align with preceding frames; or we need a human to manually move and morph these bits of each of our new "frame." Not precisely the same as converting interlaced to progressive scan.