4 ms·
> And no, there's no need for politeness, because the assassination victim was an asshole I mean, did you see what he was wearing? He definitely had it coming.
by strictnein 1y ago
> And no, there's no need for politeness, because the assassination victim was an asshole
I mean, did you see what he was wearing? He definitely had it coming.
I wasn't a fan of his, but if your source about what Charlie Kirk was out there doing and saying is The Nation of all places, you're not exactly informed on the topic.
I collect propaganda videos on Instagram. Here's a couple examples that were floating around recently:
Seeing a lot of hate for a trans person here? https://www.instagram.com/p/DOfU33FDEwp/ https://www.instagram.com/p/DOfU33FDEwp/
Also, weird for the supposed "Christian Nationalist" to be arguing against... Christian Nationalism, no? https://www.instagram.com/p/DOlpE-rEWFZ/ https://www.instagram.com/p/DOlpE-rEWFZ/
- foldr 1y agoHe also deadnamed an individual trans person in public and said that they were an abomination to God (0:31): https://x.com/RightWingWatch/status/1701259614077989121 https://x.com/RightWingWatch/status/1701259614077989121 So it's nice that he managed to be superficially polite to one trans person once (while not actually saying anything of substance except that they should just stop being trans), but let's not pretend that he had any kind of sympathetic view of trans people. Overall, his attitude to the 'alphabet mafia' reminds me rather a lot of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQf5jL3a4iU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQf5jL3a4iU
- netsharc 1y agoYou're rebuttal is basically: "I was at 3000m above sea level once and water boiled there at 90C, so if you say water boils at 100C, that's wrong!"