4 ms·
Reuter's reported that Disney did this to protect the company’s interest and was not due to the FCC. https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/disney-says
by nostromo 1y ago
Reuter's reported that Disney did this to protect the company’s interest and was not due to the FCC.
https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/disney-says-jimmy-kimmel-will-return-air-tuesday-2025-09-22/ https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/disney-says-j...
- shadowgovt 1y agoProtect the company from what? What is the quote you're referencing here?
- nostromo 1y ago> The decision was guided by what was in the entertainment company's best interest, rather than external pressure from station owners or the FCC, the sources said.
- JumpCrisscross 1y agoThat's a word salad. From today's statement: "Last Wednesday, we [Disney] made the decision to suspend production on the show to avoid further inflaming a tense situation at an emotional moment for our country" [1]. [1] https://www.npr.org/2025/09/22/nx-s1-5550330/jimmy-kimmel-back-suspended-disney-trump https://www.npr.org/2025/09/22/nx-s1-5550330/jimmy-kimmel-ba...
- nostromo 1y agoIt's not a word salad. It says this wasn't because of the FCC. Disney made the decision. And then they unmade it.