4 ms·

I'd rather have broken grammar and an honest and useful meta-signal than botched semantics. Also that better not be a sensitive conversation or contain persona

• NewsaHackO 1y ago
  But the meta singal you get is detrimental to the writer, so why wouldn't they want to mask it?
  • baobun 1y ago
    Security and ethics. If those don't apply, as mentioned, if I realize I will as mentioned also ignore them if I can and judge their future communications as malicious, incompetent, inconsiderate, and/or meaningless.
    • NewsaHackO 1y ago
      But if they are using it for copywriting/grammar edits, how would you know? For instance, have I used AI to help correct grammar for these repilies?
  • habinero 1y ago
    If I think you're fluent, I might think you're an idiot when really you just don't understand. If I know they struggle with English, I can simplify my vocabulary, speak slower/enunciate, and check in occasionally to make sure I'm communicating in a way they can follow.
    • NewsaHackO 1y ago
      Both of those options are exactly what the writer wants to avoid though, and the reason they are using AI for grammar correction in the first place.
      • habinero 1y ago
        Thank you for demonstrating my point.