4 ms·
I use Tesla FSD 99% of the time. I recently drove from Austin to Florida and back. The only time I had to take over was for road debris on the highway. Off th
by thefourthchime 1y ago
I use Tesla FSD 99% of the time. I recently drove from Austin to Florida and back.
The only time I had to take over was for road debris on the highway. Off the highway it’s very good about avoiding it. My guess is Tesla has not been focusing on this issue as it's not needed for robotaxi for phase one.
- gregoriol 1y agoThe fact that it works well in good conditions doesn't make it good. It's the unexpected situations that determine if someone lives or dies.
- thefourthchime 1y agoIt doesn't have to do with the conditions. It has to do with whether or not it's on the highway or not. The car uses a different Stack for highway and off highway, the highway has been a step child for quite a long time now
- AlotOfReading 1y agoThat used to be true. Autopilot was for highways, FSD was for other roads. FSD can be enabled on both since v12 though and this video is specifically an attempt to use FSD on highways to go cross country.
- thefourthchime 1y agoAutopilot and FSD are completely different technologies. When v12 came out it only worked on city streets, and it used V11 for the highway. Later, V12, which is the end-to-end neural network, worked on highways as well, but they use different stacks behind the scenes.
- gregoriol 1y agoThe user doesn't care about implementation details: it works or it doesn't work
- 0xcafecafe 1y agoAny software that works 90% or even 99% of the time is not safe software especially when it has to be used to operate machines with deadly power.
- ekianjo 1y agosounds like you are arguing that humans should not be driving
- senordevnyc 1y agoHumans are way better than 99% at driving.
- oblio 1y ago> The ùberphilosopher Bertrand Russell presents a particularly toxic variant of my surprise jolt in his illustration of what people in his line of business call the Problem of Induction or Problem of Inductive Knowledge (capitalized for its seriousness)—certainly the mother of all problems in life. How can we logically go from specific instances to reach general conclusions? How do we know what we know? How do we know that what we have observed from given objects and events suffices to enable us to figure out their other properties? There are traps built into any kind of knowledge gained from observation. > Consider a turkey that is fed every day. Every single feeding will firm up the bird's belief that it is the general rule of life to be fed every day by friendly members of the human race "looking out for its best interests," as a politician would say. On the afternoon of the Wednesday before Thanksgiving, something unexpected will happen to the turkey. It will incur a revision of belief. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, Nassim Nicholas Taleb, page 40
- brk 1y agoYour experience supports the other data, it’s not full self driving.
- thefourthchime 1y agoI never sait it was. That's why it can't drive itself and I need to keep my eyes on the road. The branding is terrible, but the tech is impressive.
- jve 1y agoA 99% reliability is no reliability. So per 100km I should expect 1 issue? Like multiple per week? FSD has to be much better than that to be trustworthy.
- rhetocj23 1y agoTo put it another way. A human would rather be involved in a crash because of its own doing, rather than because they let the machine take control and put trust in it.