3 ms·
True, mostly. The point with Protong, however, is that there was a globally-spanning civilization which did not have the latency we commonly associate with ear
by aa-jv 1y ago
True, mostly.
The point with Protong, however, is that there was a globally-spanning civilization which did not have the latency we commonly associate with early human development. The language was supposedly spoken globally by a world-spanning human civilization which was destroyed by the cataclysm, requiring us all to re-develop ourselves.
Like I said, Szukalski was a kook. But contrasting his findings with more scientifically appropriate methods, is certainly of great interest to those of us following along...
- jibal 1y ago> The point with Protong, however, is that there was a globally-spanning civilization which did not have the latency we commonly associate with early human development. So the "point" is that it's completely counterfactual.
- aa-jv 1y agoThere may be more to ancient life on Earth than we currently allow for in our academic institutions, and language may be the way we start to open the door to understanding just how far back it goes. Its the same with the cyclopian architecture that can be found all over the world in places we once considered disconnected. The point is, there is still a lot more to be discerned.
- jibal 1y agoSure, all of our scientific data could be wrong and the idle speculations of random people on the internet could be right, But I know where I'm putting my money. > the cyclopian architecture that can be found all over the world in places we once considered disconnected. They are in fact disconnected by anything other than the facts of physics. This is called independent invention. > The point is, there is still a lot more to be discerned. Oh yes ... but not the way you're going about it.