5 ms·
I agree that the outcome will be destructive. The questions are: Is it is more or less destructive than the alternative destruction? Who is it more economical
by palmfacehn 1y ago
I agree that the outcome will be destructive.
The questions are:
Is it is more or less destructive than the alternative destruction? Who is it more economically destructive for? Over what time period is it more or less destructive than the alternative interventionism? Is 6 months a meaningful time horizon?
It becomes muddled very quickly. I would appeal for a consistent approach which opposes both forms of destructive interventionism.
- dboreham 1y agoMany things are luck and uncontrollable events. So what you do is focus on not f.ing things up. Current usg is doing the exact opposite.
- palmfacehn 1y agoAgreed. That's a summarized version of the (ECP, knowledge problem) argument against economic interventionism.