4 ms·
At the time I started writing the article, the utility was called `analyze-commits`. Hard to think of a worse name than that! By the time I finished writing it
by mjd 1y ago
At the time I started writing the article, the utility was called `analyze-commits`. Hard to think of a worse name than that!
By the time I finished writing it I had come up with a less crappy name, but I thought I'd leave the question in the post anyway.
- antonvs 1y agoIf you’re looking for something descriptive and not clever/catchy, I propose ‘find-repeat-changes’.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- 0manrho 1y agoJust gonna +1 this. It's still fairly short, descriptive and to the point, which I generally prefer to something more "trendy" or "clever". I like it.
- alex-moon 1y agoOr indeed "Find Repeat EDits" or fred for short.
- 1718627440 1y agoWhat about git n-changed or even git nchanged. I feel like these commands need to be short and not consist of >3 words.