I’m sympathetic to parts of the Go design philosophy, but the only thing that comes to mind looking at this is “damn, that’s some awkward (nominal-looking) synt

I’m sympathetic to parts of the Go design philosophy, but the only thing that comes to mind looking at this is “damn, that’s some awkward (nominal-looking) syntax for (structural) intersection types”. (It also feels to me that this sort of anonymous embedding is materially different for interfaces vs structs, though I admit that from a type-theoretic perspective it’s not.)