3 ms·
> I believe the supreme court has in the past few decades ruled treaties ratified by congress aren't binding... This supreme court doesn't appear to be constra
by paulryanrogers 1y ago
> I believe the supreme court has in the past few decades ruled treaties ratified by congress aren't binding...
This supreme court doesn't appear to be constrained by past rulings or even constitutional amendments. And 6 of 9 are on team whatever-Trump-wants.
- cma 1y agoI think the ruling I was thinking of was Medellín v. Texas (2008), but several more throughout past century despite constitution being very clear. Goldwater v. Carter (1979) let the president unilaterally dissolve a ratified treaty