2 ms·
The problem is, overtaking is one thing when you got two parallel rails and ample point switches. But when you don't have them or only every 100km or whatnot,
by mschuster91 1y ago
The problem is, overtaking is one thing when you got two parallel rails and ample point switches.
But when you don't have them or only every 100km or whatnot, or any of the potential places (such as in a train station) just isn't long enough to accept and buffer a 3 miles long train... then good luck, there just is no physical opportunity for the faster passenger train to speed ahead, not to mention the absurd amount of energy wasted in braking and then re-accelerating that 3 mile freight monster.
Fixing this would be possible - either by limiting the maximum length of a train or by forcing the extension of parallel rail segments. The former makes logistics significantly more challenging plus it requires more staff (which is the real problem, long haul isn't wanted much these days, neither rail nor road), the latter is darn expensive and someone has to foot the bill - Congress certainly won't.
- rlpb 1y ago> ...not to mention the absurd amount of energy wasted in braking and then re-accelerating that 3 mile freight monster. > Fixing this would be possible - either by limiting the maximum length of a train... It can't be both. Splitting a freight train and then stopping and starting the smaller trains would take the same amount of energy as stopping and starting the single long freight train. Unless they're deliberately moving empty freight cars to make it artificially long.
- cjbgkagh 1y agoThe smaller trains wouldn’t have to stop as frequently. The total number of stops increases but the average rail cart sees fewer stops.