> Purportedly codenamed "NT OS/2" during development Not purportedly, absolutely was. It's in the design docs. > many people have mistakenly thought "NT" stoo

> Purportedly codenamed "NT OS/2" during development Not purportedly, absolutely was. It's in the design docs. > many people have mistakenly thought "NT" stood for "Network Technology." Never heard that one. It's always been "New Technology" (which is what it does stand for) or "NTen" after the Intel N10 it was going to ship on. --- Anyways, not much to say about the article. It's short and not very deep.