> Even with no cars, we'd still need roads. But you'd need less of them. > The majority of the wear on them isn't from passenger vehicles. Correct, but irrel

> Even with no cars, we'd still need roads. But you'd need less of them. > The majority of the wear on them isn't from passenger vehicles. Correct, but irrelevant. The I-93 around Boston does not have 4-6 lanes each way because they have lots of trucks during rush hour.