4 ms·
> If there is a conscious intent of disregarding safety as you say, the Readme should have a prominent warning about that. What do you consider this clause in
by koolba 1y ago
> If there is a conscious intent of disregarding safety as you say, the Readme should have a prominent warning about that.
What do you consider this clause in the LICENSE:
>> THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR
OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
- CorrectHorseBat 1y agoA standard clause you can find in every open source license? It doesn't say anything about how serious the project takes security
- Yeask 1y agoYou write only Rust code don't you?
- CorrectHorseBat 1y agoI wish ;) You're talking about how Rust code usually uses the MIT license and this is a part of the MIT license? Every open source license has a very similar clause, include but not limited to BSD, GPL, CDDL, MPL and Apache.