> I always checked LI for applicants which looked interesting on "paper" but which had not come through a trusted source This is a good observation.. ruminati

> I always checked LI for applicants which looked interesting on "paper" but which had not come through a trusted source This is a good observation.. rumination.. contribution? I can't find the right descriptive noun. Anyway, I get it. Perhaps the board is divided between regions inclined to use LI and not.